PSES270-05/06
PSES270-05/06
Award Date:
16 September 2005
Case Number: PSES270-05/06
Province: Eastern Cape
Applicant: D.F. CLAASSEN
Respondent: DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION – WESTERN CAPE
Issue: Unfair Dismissal - Constructive Dismissal
Award Date: 16 September 2005
Arbitrator: L.O Martin
EDUCATION
LABOUR
RELATIONS
COUNCIL ARBITRATION AWARD
Commissioner: L. MARTIN
Case No.: PSES270-05/06
Date of Award: 16 SEPTEMBER 2005
In the ARBITRATION between:
D.F. CLAASSEN
(Union / Applicant)
and
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION – WESTERN CAPE
(Respondent)
Union/Applicant’s representative: UNREPRESENTED
Union/Applicant’s address: P.O. BOX 59
ASHTON
6715
Telephone: 023X6152003
Telefax: 023X6153387
Respondent’s representative: I. FEBRUARY
Respondent’s address: PRIVATE BAG X9114
CAPE TOWN
8000
Telephone: 021X4672950
Telefax: 021X4258612
PARTICULARS OF PROCEEDINGS AND REPRESENTATION
The arbitration took place at the offices of the Department of Education - Western Cape in Cape Town on 14 September 2005. The respondent, the Department of Education - Western Cape, was represented by Ms. I. February, its labour relations officer. The applicant, Mr. D. F. Claassen, was not represented.
The file record of the Education Labour Relations Council (ELRC) shows that the applicant was timeously and properly served the notice of set down of these proceedings on 12 July 2005.
Having satisfied myself that the applicant had been properly notified of these proceedings I proceeded with the arbitration in the absence of the applicant party.
SUMMARY OF EVIDENCE AND ARGUMENT
The respondent handed into evidence a letter forwarded to it from the applicant and dated 5 September 2005.
ANALYSIS OF EVIDENCE AND ARGUMENT
The evidence shows that the applicant has communicated to the respondent that he intends withdrawing this matter. This is however not a properly constituted withdrawal of this matter as no such formal communication therof has been forwarded to the Education Labour Relations Council by the applicant and cannot be accepted as such.
AWARD
In the light of the applicant’s failure to attend at the arbitration proceedings I dismiss this application for relief in terms of the provisions of the Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995 as amended.
L.O Martin
Commissioner
Province: Eastern Cape
Applicant: D.F. CLAASSEN
Respondent: DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION – WESTERN CAPE
Issue: Unfair Dismissal - Constructive Dismissal
Award Date: 16 September 2005
Arbitrator: L.O Martin
EDUCATION
LABOUR
RELATIONS
COUNCIL ARBITRATION AWARD
Commissioner: L. MARTIN
Case No.: PSES270-05/06
Date of Award: 16 SEPTEMBER 2005
In the ARBITRATION between:
D.F. CLAASSEN
(Union / Applicant)
and
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION – WESTERN CAPE
(Respondent)
Union/Applicant’s representative: UNREPRESENTED
Union/Applicant’s address: P.O. BOX 59
ASHTON
6715
Telephone: 023X6152003
Telefax: 023X6153387
Respondent’s representative: I. FEBRUARY
Respondent’s address: PRIVATE BAG X9114
CAPE TOWN
8000
Telephone: 021X4672950
Telefax: 021X4258612
PARTICULARS OF PROCEEDINGS AND REPRESENTATION
The arbitration took place at the offices of the Department of Education - Western Cape in Cape Town on 14 September 2005. The respondent, the Department of Education - Western Cape, was represented by Ms. I. February, its labour relations officer. The applicant, Mr. D. F. Claassen, was not represented.
The file record of the Education Labour Relations Council (ELRC) shows that the applicant was timeously and properly served the notice of set down of these proceedings on 12 July 2005.
Having satisfied myself that the applicant had been properly notified of these proceedings I proceeded with the arbitration in the absence of the applicant party.
SUMMARY OF EVIDENCE AND ARGUMENT
The respondent handed into evidence a letter forwarded to it from the applicant and dated 5 September 2005.
ANALYSIS OF EVIDENCE AND ARGUMENT
The evidence shows that the applicant has communicated to the respondent that he intends withdrawing this matter. This is however not a properly constituted withdrawal of this matter as no such formal communication therof has been forwarded to the Education Labour Relations Council by the applicant and cannot be accepted as such.
AWARD
In the light of the applicant’s failure to attend at the arbitration proceedings I dismiss this application for relief in terms of the provisions of the Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995 as amended.
L.O Martin
Commissioner